My life could have stayed on course perhaps if I had wanted it to had I not engaged in being a participant of a science experiment willing ready and able to do that I still wonder and have concerns about rouge doctors mostly sometime in the future.  I would not wish my experience on anyone therefore I have concerns about the Dark Science I was engaged in relation to the Nuremberg Code

Save it all for the true Enemies of the State such as foreign agents

Help protect the civilian population.

let the ready willing and able sign onto any such projects yet protect the common man if any from others regarding experiments of any nature that doesn't follow the code

 

also to judge my participation by this code

We must keep All science  and persons from using undefined experiments on persons civil 

while the Dept. of Health and human services have much policy regarding these ten points in the code so the code seems redundant but it's not

Sign the Nuremberg code into law

 

The Nuremberg Code has not been officially accepted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association. In fact, the Code's reference to Hippocratic duty to the individual patient and the need to provide information was not initially favored by the American Medical Association.

YOUR SIGNATURE HELPS

 

we have in 1981 the 1rst rule into executive order law

 

Executive Order 12333

 

2.10 Human Experimentation. No element of the Intelligence Community shall sponsor, contract for, or conduct research on human subjects except in accordance with guidelines issued by the Department of Health and Human Services. The subject's informed consent shall be documented as required by those guidelines.

signed into law by Ronald Reagan

this needs to apply to all science or non-science everyone not just a few agencies in the government

the concept that there could be future rouge doctors or another person with political bends that gain means to destructive methods on persons unknown is a horrid idea

please consider this code does no harm to science in my estimate perhaps at times making it harder for research at times into certain things yet for the most part to protect the common citizen and persons civil yet of foreign blood.

we need the rest of the nine remaining points done up as an issue if not one at a time all at a time then, please.

The ten points of the Nuremberg Code

1>The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
2>The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3>The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4>The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5>No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6>The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment..
7>Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8>The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9>During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10>During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.